There aren't any obvious paralells going on. I mean, there isn't anything in this image that screams HAL HARTLEY. Nor the other way around. But I think their works vibrate at similar frequencies. The combination of staged trashiness, trashy Americana, and the curious mixture of delight and horror about their subjects...
(discussing the heroine's abortion in the diner)
Of course, the more obvious (pop art) comparison to Hartley would be Roy Lichtenstein. Here's a very famous Roy:
The text in the thought-bubble might as well have been ripped straight from a Hartley film. But of course, it's the other way around, historically speaking...
I think the Lichtenstein comparison is more X-marks-the-spot, if only for the soft drama that both artists bring into their characters word bubbles.
ReplyDeleteIts interesting you thought of Wesselman when Hartleying. Wesselman seems to me so much more ecstatic to present its products, where Hartley, especially in TRUST, made a feeling more personal for me. Maybe because there is not much of the greater world in TRUST, that its closed off to a few characters and locations. They don't really feel as representative of products or platitude. But maybe they're not individual either. Anyway, I like where you're going with this.